Campaign: Q2: Changes in procedure or regulation

Award count (0.25) for non-final AOM to suggest allowable matter

Pay the Examiners for more than just FAOMs. Award counts (e.g. of 0.25) for a subsequent non-final AOM which indicates allowable/patentable subject matter. The current system, and the one before it, reward an Examiner for writing one FAOM and then sticking to it at each stage, unless its deficiencies are demonstrated so clearly that the Examiner must write another, substantively different, FAOM, and then only in response ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

2 votes
2 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q3: Interviews

effect of PTO interview practice on decision to file RCE

I think the PTO has directed examiner's to be fair and reasonable in allowing interviews after final rejections but they have made it almost impossible to reach an agreement on an amendment to overcome the rejection(s) because the examiners always say the amendment requires a further search or raises a new issue so you have to file an RCE to get the amendment entered (even if the examiner agrees that it overcomes the ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
1 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q2: Changes in procedure or regulation

Count System Changes to Stop Improper Final Rejetions

I am an examiner at the USPTO and have already submitted this idea via the internal ideascale site, where it is currently awaiting moderator approval, but it is relevant to this discussion so I will repost. The response I have seen in the patent blogosphere to the 11 questions put out by the office indicates that many practitioners view the practice of incentivizing examiners to close prosecution as a primary culprit, ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
2 up votes
1 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q6: RCEs after final rejections

Forwarding to Examiner time impacting Extension of Time Fee

The extension of time cost can become significant relative to the RCE fee, making it more likely we would more quickly file an RCE. Especially when the legal instrument person has taken 1-1.5+ months to officially forward our amendment/response to the Examiner (which starts the Examiner clock at that time). Forwarding to the Examiner needs to reliably take only a few days (not weeks or months).

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
1 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q2: Changes in procedure or regulation

End RCE practice-Institute progressively increasing response fee

As noted elsewhere, one Response before Final is too short. Why have a limit? Compact prosecution is a false goal if it results in useless patents. And the current RCE practice assumes that no prosecution needs more than one Reponse if the attorney is being "reasonable;" when in fact a "reasonable" attorney (working with a reasonable examiner) may need different numbers of responses in different cases. Why not substitute ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
1 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q2: Changes in procedure or regulation

EXPAND ON DRAWINGS IN APPLICATION PROCESS

I am currently in the process of filing for a patent with the assistance of an attorney. The adage,"A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words", needs to be applied to the application process. Utilization of videos and photos of the device or item that is being submitted for a patent would speed up the process dramatically. In working with my patent attorney, I supplied her with a detailed video along with photos, with explanation ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
1 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q10: Avoiding RCEs

RCE Practice

(1) If within your practice you file a higher or lower number of RCEs for certain clients or areas of technology as compared to others, what factor(s) can you identify for the difference in filings? Not applicable (2) What change(s), if any, in USPTO procedure(s) or regulation(s) would reduce your need to file RCEs? None (3) What effect(s), if any, does the USPTO’s interview practice have on your decision to file ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q8: RCEs and order of examination

after final practice

The change in order of examination of RCEs did not affect after final practice. Most attorneys request interviews after final rejections, file requests for reconsideration, possibly submit a 1.131 or 1.132 declaration, and if those fail, there are no alternatives but to file an RCE.

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q2: Changes in procedure or regulation

Proposed USPTO RCE Improvements:

Each RCE Office Action within normal prosecution timing (i.e., within 2-3 months of Response/Amendment). Applicant requests one additional round of prosecution at a time (not the current 2 rounds). Additional search & interview included with each round of prosecution. Multiple interviews totaling 2-4 hours is ok. Fee per additional round, comparable to a normal round of prosecution. As many prosecution rounds ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Q2: Changes in procedure or regulation

Solutions to the RCE Backlog Problem

The RCE problem is due in the main to Examiners finally rejecting claims that should either: 1) be allowed or 2) be given nonfinal rejections. The current system of measuring performance by which Examiners get a point for a disposal, encourages Examiners to move cases to final rejection or allowance as early in the prosecution of the application as possible. They get credit for allowance, but fewer questions are ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active